Invoice Printing Parameters and Notes

Created by Shawne O'Connor, Modified on Wed, 24 Sep at 1:04 PM by Shawne O'Connor

When referring to the Invoice, assume Customer Copy (OE630A)    The Office Copy (OE630B) should always print, not email, regardless of how any and all parameters are set.  It should print 1 copy only.

 

 

Parameters involved:

Dist parm to Print a copy of the Invoice with the Email   SDF173/SYSCNSDP    - Only comes into play when the customer is set to Email (maybe Fax- not sure- whatever historically we have been doing)

 

Customer Parm:   

Invoice Print E/F/S/Y/N   =  ARCUST/CSPCYN

E=email

F=Fax

S-Special handling – do nothing with this

Y-Print the Invoice

N-Print the invoice

***confusing note   - This flag used to read ‘ Invoice special handling ‘ at one time the ‘Y’ meant special handling and the ‘N’ meant NO special handling(but printed).    We changed this when we added the E/F  and tried to make clarify it a bit better.  The Y would mean print and the S would mean ‘Special’ handling.  However, the N also means print, as you can’t really turn off the invoice print at the customer level.   Not saying this is correct, but this is how it historically worked.  We have many Metalware customers, who had there ARCUST/CSPCYN flag set to ‘N’   and the invoices still printed. (not initially, but that was a bug we needed to fix)

 

 

Mail Invoice at Order Level- This refers to either printing or Emailing.  Historically, we put an invoice in snail mail.   Mail still means print(so we can snail mail) or Email.

OEOPNORD – OOMAIL   - as we all know, this can be changed at each individual order level with the infamous window with the Mail checkbox.

 

 

Need to test all scenarios.

Dist parm SDFD173  set to ‘Y’     and test all iterations of the CSPCYN flag.    Each iteration of the CSPCYN flag should be tested with an OOMAIL = Y and an OOMAIL = N

Then retest all of the above with the SDF173 = ‘N’

 

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article